Aims The aim of this assignment is to assess the student’s ability to choose a

ORDER YOUR PAPER AND GET QUALITY FOR YOUR MONEY

AimsThe aim of this assignment is to assess the student’s ability to choose a national/state-supported health promotion program and critically review/evaluate its effectiveness in terms of its overall impact on the health status of targeted populations.Examples only:The national Binge-Drinking CampaignThe National Quit Now smoking cessation campaignThe National Immunisation StrategyAssessment GuidelinesStudents need to choose a current or recent (within the last 5 years) national/state supported health promotion program and critically review/evaluate its effectiveness in terms of its impact on the health status of targeted communities. When choosing a program please review and consider if you can source data for the evaluation; for example if you choose a campaign that commenced in 2018 or 2019, will you be able to source enough data to evaluate the campaign?It is recommended that the student review the health promotion program in a systematic manner that includes:Setting the background context of the program, including how and where the need for it aroseCritically review the political climate and/or political influences and relevant legislation that led to, and supported the planning, resourcing and implementation of the program.Critically evaluate the findings and impact of the program, including reported successes, limitations, barriers and opportunities.Summarise the program in terms of overall effectiveness, lessons learnt and potential future directionsTips*Remember that a critique review/analysis is more than a description of the program. You need to identify and explain the argument of the program and provide your own discussion about that argument. It is best approached using an open questioning method of comparing and contrasting.The assignment must be ordered as follows:title of the assignment at the top of the first pageassignment body textreference listappendices.The assignment word count should include any words in the body of the assignment, including headings, in-text references and quotations, but not the title page, reference list or appendices.Pay particular attention to the specified length (word count) of your assignment. Keep your word count to within plus or minus 10% of the specified length. Be aware that to be fair to all students, the marker will cease marking after the additional 10% word count has been reached.Marking rubic: Background context of the program, including its inception (why and how)Background context of the program, including its inception (why and how)- 20%. Critically review the political influence and relevant legislatation that led to and supported the planning, the resources and implementation of the program-20%. Critically evaluate the findings and impact of the program including, reported successes, limitaions, barriers and opportunities-20%. Summerise the program in terms of overall effectiveness, lessons learnt, and potential future directions-20%. Literature and evidence( relevant and reputable)-10%.CrCritically evaluate the findings and impact of the program, including reported successes, limitations, barriers and opportunitiesCritically evaluate the findings and impact of the program, includingreported successes, limitations, barriers and opportunitiesitically Critically review the political climate and/or political influences and relevantlegislation that led to and supported the planning, resourcing andimplementation of the programreview the political climate and/or political influences and relevantlegislation that led to and supported the planning, resourcing andimplementation of the program