Home
Blog
AIU Project Management Microsoft Project Gantt Charts Discussion

AIU Project Management Microsoft Project Gantt Charts Discussion

Daniel Kevins

0 comments

I need an explanation for this Management question to help me study.

Assignment Details

Gantt charts and earned value management (EVM) are frequently used in project management. When properly used, they can provide project managers with information about how the project is progressing. Early warning signs provide project managers with a means to help get their projects back on track. Although Gantt charts and earned value calculations can be created and performed in Microsoft Excel, many project management software suites can provide users with enhanced tools for simplifying these tasks. Some of the most popular project management software suites are as follows:

Microsoft Project
Monday.com
Teamwork
FunctionFox
GanttPro
ClickUp

Select 1 of the software suites from the list above, or choose your favorite (if not listed). Describe and discuss the following points about the software:

Cost, features, and rating
Strengths and weaknesses
Your impression

After posting your response, respond to at least 2 of your peers. How does their evaluated software suite compare to yours? Discuss how one suite might address any deficiencies of the other.

In your own words, please post a response to the Discussion Board and comment on other postings. You will be graded on the quality of your postings.

For assistance with your assignment, please use your text, Web resources, and all course materials.

Discussion Board Reminders:

Must have three posts: A main post and two replies to peers.
- First post: Either your main post or a reply to others must be posted before midnight CT (Central time) on Friday of each week.
- Second and third post: Must be posted on a different day from the first post.
Connect to content: At least one post must refer to course learning materials. See the Academic Resource on Discussion Boards for help with connecting to the content.
Engaging in class discussions: For more information on making the most of your class dialog, review the Academic Resource on Discussion Boards.

Grading Rubric

Assignment Criteria	Proficient Descriptor	Points
Quality of Main Post 16 Points Total	Student’s main post meets or exceeds the following requirements: Responds completely to all of parts of discussion question (4 points) Communicates content information accurately and/or logically (4 points) Delivers a thoughtful response demonstrating insights and reflections (4 points) Connects to both key content concepts and personal experiences (4 points)	/16 pts.
Response to Peers 16 Points Total	Responds to a minimum of two peers (8 points per response) Substantive response (4 points) Furthers the conversation with peers. Examples could include (4 points): Provides additional resources Connects to key concepts Shares personal or professional experiences Contributes new information or perspective Presents a competing viewpoint	/16 pts.
Support from Learning Resources 4 Points Total	At least one post refers to course learning resources.	/4 pts.
Professional Writing 4 points	Response is well-organized, clear, and free of grammatical and mechanical errors. Posts demonstrate courtesy and respect for others.	/4 pts.
Total	40 points possible	/40 pts.

About the Author

Daniel Kevins

Follow me