art reading -05

Total two entry (1 and 2) Each entry write at least 200 words. Total at least 400 words, put answers in attached file template.

Please download and use Reading Response Template (See attached file) to format your responses.


ENTRY 1:

Note: this is a multi-part entry. Please read the interview between Lindsey Davis and artist Maya Lin, THEN spend time looking at the website for Lin’s project “What is Missing?”. Please make sure to clearly respond to both sources in your writing.

Part 1:

Title: “Dematerializing the Memorial” (Links to an external site.) interview with Maya Lin

Author: Lindsey Davis

Note: be very careful to attribute the interviewer (Lindsey Davis) and the interviewee (artist May Lin) correctly in your responses. Do not get them mixed up.

Part 2:

Please spend time looking around the What is Missing (Links to an external site.) project website (this is what the interview above is about)

ENTRY 2:

Title: Doris Salcedo: The Materiality of Mourning (see attached file)

“From the Artist” (pp. xvii-xix) Note: this essay is authored by Doris Salcedo herself

“Introduction” (pp. 1-13) Note: this Introduction is authored by Mary Schneider Enriquez

Author: Mary Schneider Enriquez

Criteria for Success:

Below is the rubric that will be used to evaluate your Reading Response Assignments. You may use this rubric and the guidelines above to self evaluate whether you have done an excellent, satisfactory or insufficient job completing the assignment.

Rubric

Reading Response Rubric (1)

Reading Response Rubric (1)

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences

2 to >1.5 pts

Full Points

For both entries, student actively refers to at least 2 specifics from the reading(s) to support their reflections. It is clear through their discussion that they’ve read/viewed and engaged with ALL assigned material.

1.5 to >1.0 pts

Sufficient

1 to >0.5 pts

Room for Improvement

References to the reading content are somewhat vague, tangential, unrelated to the reading content or how it relates to art / one entry is missing

0.5 to >0.0 pts

Insufficient

0 pts

Zero

No clear references to the reading content / unclear that the student has truly read all materials

2 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePersonal reflection, interpretation, analysis and synthesis

2 to >1.5 pts

Full Points

Student actively engages with the content of the reading(s) using personal reflection, analysis, interpretation, and/or synthesis, foregrounding their own original thinking about the reading.

1.5 to >1.0 pts

Sufficient

1 to >0.5 pts

Room for Improvement

Student’s response veers towards summarizing or telling what the reading was about / is vague, lacking in strong support details / lacks strong personal reflection / one entry is missing

0.5 to >0.0 pts

Insufficient

0 pts

Zero

No submissions / submissions are far too short / submissions do not respond clearly to the correct assigned readings

2 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProper attribution, quoting, paraphrasing

1 to >0.75 pts

Full Points

Student consistently attributes sources by name and title accurately and properly quotes and paraphrases when referring to someone else’s words or ideas.

0.75 to >0.5 pts

Sufficient

0.5 to >0.25 pts

Room for Improvement

Student sometimes, but not consistently, quotes, paraphrases, and attributes by name the authors whose words/ideas they are sharing / one entry is missing

0.25 to >0.0 pts

Insufficient

0 pts

Zero

Student fails to properly attribute any sources by name/title, or to quote/paraphrase properly, thereby risking a situation of plagiarism.

1 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLength

1 to >0.75 pts

Full Points

The BODY of the student’s response (not including headers, in-text citations, etc.) is between 200-300 words in length.

0.75 to >0.5 pts

Sufficient

0.5 to >0.25 pts

Room for Improvement

Both responses are under the 200 word minimum by up to 25 words (between 175-199 words) / one response is more that 25 words below 200 or missing

0.25 to >0.0 pts

Insufficient

0 pts

Zero

Both responses are less than 175 words in length / one or both entries are missing

1 pts

Total Points: 6

PreviousNex

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more
error: Content is protected !!