• Home
  • Blog
  • Assignment Format: Conclusion – What was the conclusion drawn by the court? Pr

Assignment Format: Conclusion – What was the conclusion drawn by the court? Pr

0 comments

GET A PROFESSIONAL PAPER DONE BY AN EXPERT

Assignment Format:Conclusion – What was the conclusion drawn by the court? Provide a one-paragraphexplanation of the actual decision of the last deciding court. For example, the SupremeCourt of Wisconsin ruled in favor of UWP for the claim of defamation of character,which deals with, do not simply state, the court ruled in favor of UWP. Instead, state thereason why briefly.Rule – What rule(s) is being applied in the case? State the rule that the court used toarrive at its conclusion. This is an actual rule; for example, if the case was based onnegligence, you will have to explain the rule for failure briefly.Application – State, the facts of the case, reiterate the rules, and explain how and why therules apply to your set of facts. Additionally, indicate why the court ruled in the way thatit did. This section accounts for 90% of your points and should be at minimum one anda half pages long (double-spaced). Make sure this section is thorough and include yourarguments for why the case was decided the way that it was. Your goal is to interweavethe rule to your set of facts. You will start this section “In this case,” and then provideyour case facts and begin explaining why it was decided the way it was. If you disagreewith a ruling, you can state why you feel the case was decided incorrectly.Conclusion – Restate your conclusion from paragraph one. You can change the wording,but you have essentially reiterated your conclusion from the first paragraph as if to say“in conclusion…”ASSIGNMENT:Grant and Debbie enter into a contract binding Grant personally to do some delicate cabinetwork. Grant assigns his rights and delegates performance of his duties to Clarence.(a) On being informed of this, Debbie agrees with Clarence, in consideration of Clarence’s promise to do the work, that Debbie will accept Clarence’s work, if properly done, instead of the performance promised by Grant. Later, without cause, Debbie refuses to allow Clarence to proceed with the work, though Clarence is ready to do so, and makes demand on Grant that Grant perform. Grant refuses. Can Clarence recover damages from Debbie? Can Debbie recover from Grant?(b) Instead, assume that Debbie refuses to permit Clarence to do the work, employs another carpenter, and brings an action against Grant, claiming as damages the difference between the contract price and the cost to employ the other carpenter. Explain whether Debbie will prevail.

About the Author

Follow me


{"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}