• Home
  • Blog
  • Assignment: Philosophical Differences Between Qualitative And Quantitative Paradigms And Approaches.

Assignment: Philosophical Differences Between Qualitative And Quantitative Paradigms And Approaches.

0 comments

Assignment: Philosophical Differences Between Qualitative And Quantitative Paradigms And Approaches.

Assignment: Philosophical Differences Between Qualitative And Quantitative Paradigms And Approaches.

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS

PLEASE Review PSY635 Week Two Discussion Scenario ATTACHED!In that scenario, the three instructors realized there are limits to the insights they can gain through anonymous counting of discussion posts. The instructors would like to answer two additional research questions: (a) How do their students actually feel about the intervention? and (b) How do students view the influence of the intervention on their learning inside and outside of the classroom (if applicable)?

Compare the characteristics of appropriate research designs and recommend a qualitative research design that would facilitate answering the instructors’ additional questions. Explain the philosophical paradigm underlying the recommended approach. Evaluate the required articles attached and describe the  assumptions the instructors might have to set aside as they enter into a qualitative research study. Be sure to identify any ethical issues that may apply to the research. Review the characteristics of the quantitative approach described in the PSY635WK2 DISCUSSION attached. Explain the ways in which the quantitative approach and paradigm differs from the qualitative approach and paradigm you have recommended here.

REQUIRED ARTICLES REFERENCES

Frost, N. (2011). Qualitative research methods in psychology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Chapter 1: Qualitative Research in Psychology

Ponterotto, J. G. (2013). Qualitative research in multicultural psychology: Philosophical underpinnings, popular approaches, and ethical considerations. Qualitative Psychology1(S), 19-32. doi:10.1037/2326-3598.1.S.19

  • attachmentPSY635WeekTwoScenario-2.pdf
  • attachmentPSY635Week2Discussion1.pdf
  • attachmentQualitativeResearchinMulticulturalPsychology.pdf
  • attachmentEBOOK_Qualitative_Research_Methods_in_Psychology_C…_—-_PART_1_Some_Core_Approaches.pdf

PSY635 Week Two Scenario

Three instructors teach the same online course and have devised an experimental intervention to improve student motivation to actively participate in discussions. The course is a core requirement for all psychology students, and students are assigned to particular sections at random rather than by instructor choice.

The average class size for this particular course is 45 students. To get a large enough sample for adequate analysis, the instructors have decided to include two sections for each instructor in the experiment. The first section will serve as the control group (no experimental intervention), and the second section will receive the intervention. Anonymous data about the dependent variable will be pooled for the three sections comprising the control group and the three sections that receive the intervention.

The independent variable is the intervention, which may be an incentive such as digital badges or an instructional intervention involving changing the instructions for the guided response. The dependent variable will be the number of response (not initial) posts per student that exceed two lines of text. The researchers have decided to use the Week Four discussion for data collection, reasoning that it may take some time for the intervention to become effective.

About the Author

Follow me


{"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}