This week we are going to be learning about the integration of mobile devices into your Information Governance program. Mobile devices become the most common digital devices in the world for individual use. There is significant expectation that your organization will integrate the functions of these devices into your workflow. Not only the devices owned and directly managed by your organization, but also those mobile devices owned by the individuals working for you. You must manage, or govern, these devices appropriate controls to protect your organization. We will explore this week the risks presented by both personally owned mobile devices and those owned by the organization but carried outside the physical boundaries of the organization and the steps your organization must make to control them. For your optional additional lecture this week, I’m providing some information about creating your literature review. I want you to know about the resources the University Library and the Writing Center can provide. This will be helpful to you. For your tenth week in this course, we have one chapter from the textbook and three research papers that you will be required to read. The three research papers are available from the University of the Cumberlands online library. You must download and read all three additional research papers. The discussion this week is focused upon the factors presented in the textbook regarding how organizations can cope with the accelerated rise in popularity of mobile devices in the workplace. There are no other portfolio project deliverables due this week.

power point fire prevention and education

Please create 8 slides presentation

Building construction is critical to effective code enforcement. For this assignment, you will create a PowerPoint presentation that identifies the types of building construction and the differences between each. You will also be required to identify building construction in your area and answer questions regarding hazards and means of fire control.

For this assignment, you will create a PowerPoint presentation. In your presentation, include the following items as outlined below.
Describe occupancy classifications in your area as well as building construction materials. Explain how they correlate with fire prevention and code enforcement.

Identify characteristics of unsafe structures in your area as they relate to code requirements.

Identify the building construction type in your area that poses the biggest hazards for potential conflagration and fire spread.

Identify how pre-construction fire prevention measures increase the safety of general fire and life safety provisions.

Explain how plans review and structural control as a means for fire protection would improve the safety of unsafe structures in your area.
Your presentation must be a minimum of eight slides in length.

The required title and references pages do not count toward the total page requirement

Activity: Open these three links to digital repositories containing resources related to the dropping of the atomic bomb. Browse through each repository (Truman
Library Collections, Voices of the Manhattan Project, and National Security Archive), and think about how useful these repositories would be to you if you were a
historian seeking to write a biography on the scientist Leo Szilard (pronounced SIL-lard) who helped develop the atomic bomb and also campaigned against its use.
1. Truman Library Collections
2. Voices of the Manhattan Project
3. Atomic Heritage Foundation

As you explore each repository, try to locate the following primary sources that you might consult to write a chapter about Szilard’s campaign against dropping the
atomic bomb. Each primary source is located in only one of the above repositories. Try your best to locate each source, but it is OK if you are not able to locate all
three. If you are successful in your search, try skimming through the sources you find.
1. The transcription of the oral history interview with Tom Evans, a close friend of President Truman’s, discussing scientists’ opposition to the use of the
atomic bomb
2. A petition against the use of the atomic bomb circulated by Szilard directed toward President Truman
3. An interview with Lilli Hornig, a scientist who signed Szilard’s petition against the use of the atomic bomb
To do this, develop search terms similar to the examples shown in the Module Two Module Overview. Only use these three online repositories to locate these
sources—do not consult Google or any other search engine. Take notes on the search terms that are successful and keep the links to the sources you find.
Prompt: In two to three sentences, respond to each question. To develop your responses, combine your experience using search terms to locate the three
primary sources in this module with your own reflections on the questions posed. Regardless of whether or not you were able to find all three primary sources,
complete all question prompts before you submit your responses. If you were not able to find the primary sources, let your instructor know what search terms
you did use so he or she can provide you with feedback on how to develop effective search terms.

1. Describe your overall experience locating these primary sources. Was it challenging or straightforward? Do you learn anything interesting along theway?

2. Were you able to locate an interview with Tom Evans, a close friend of President Truman’s, who interacted with scientists who were trying to reach
Truman with their campaign against the use of the atomic bomb? Share your search terms and a link to the primary source.

3. Were you able to locate a petition against the use of the atomic bomb circulated by Leo Szilard directed toward President Truman? Share your search
terms and a link to the primary source.

4. Were you able to locate an interview with Lilli Hornig, a scientist who signed Szilard’s petition against the use of the atomic bomb?

Share your search
terms and a link to the primary source.

2
Rubric
Guidelines for Submission: Respond to all four questions. Each response should be two to three sentences in length.

Analyzing Arguments

1. What basic principle, issue, or value is at the root of the argument?

2. What is the main claim? Is it a claim of fact, value, or policy?

3. What values are at play in the following statements?

It is a lot easier to debunk something than to create something worthwhile oneself. (paragraph 2)

People like to imagine Shakespeare freebasing and rolling up joints because they see him as an establishment figure. (paragraph 3)

The fact is that reading the Bard’s works or going to see a good production of one of his plays is infinitely more rewarding than taking drugs. (paragraph 3)

4. What other values (in addition to the ones from question 3 above) are important to Pinching’s argument?

5. How does Pinching connect the past to a larger point about contemporary Western culture?

SEE ATTACHED

Workshop: Report

Purpose

Analyzing your peers’ drafts and providing constructive feedback not only helps them improve their assignments, but it also helps you practice you-attitude and build goodwill with your peers. The feedback you receive in turn will help you craft a stronger final version of the assignment.

Instructions

For this peer workshop, you will post a complete draft of the Executive Summary portion from the recommendation report. You will then provide feedback on your assigned team’s post.

Part 1:

Present a draft of your team’s Executive Summary in a post to this discussion board, including the following:

1. A complete draft of the Executive Summary from your team’s Recommendation Report
2. A list of questions/concerns you have about your draft that you would like your peers to respond to

Ana is a 45-year-old African-American female that presented to her physician’s office for her annual check-up. Ana has a history of diabetes, obesity, and noncompliance with diet and medications to control her diabetes. “I just can’t afford those meds, my girls need braces!” she shrugs. She is wearing a breast cancer awareness shirt and mentions that she beat breast cancer 10 years ago with chemo, radiation, and left-sided radical mastectomy. She a single mother of three teenagers and has migraines with each monthly cycle. During the history review, Ana shares with you that she has not been feeling like herself for the past six months, she has been unusually tired and her migraines have been more frequent and debliating. She stated, “I am very busy with my children; I haven’t had time to get it checked out, but my headaches are so severe, I’ll miss work. And what’s even stranger is I will have nausea and vomiting but outside my migraines. At first, I thought I ate something that didn’t agree with me, but it’s too unpredictable for that.” Her oldest daughter is with her and mentions that she sometimes talks and walks “funny.” Ana has a positive family history of breast cancer; both her mother and grandmother have been treated for breast cancer. Ana last mammogram was a year ago and clear. Based on the physical findings Ana will undergo a diagnostic MRI.

Instructions

In a 2-page paper, describe the care that Ana would require and address the questions below.

1. What risk factors does Ana have that could predispose her to the development of cancer?
2. What signs and symptoms could indicate that Ana has developed cancer? Which cancer do you suspect and why?
3. Based on Anna’s risk factors and presenting problems, identify three care strategies that you would use to provide quality care to Ana. Provide rationale to explain why you chose these strategies.

Instructions

Please carefully read the following assignment details in its entirety.

Choosing a topic:

This Toulmin project will help you practice what you have learned so far in this course.

1. First, you will choose a topic of interest. Make sure that you choose a public debate with clear sides and stakes (see attachment to understand what this means!).
2. Then, you need to research that debate to narrow the topic’s scope, so it can be easily discussed within the word count range.
   • For example, you may be interested in learning more about traffic issues in the United States. However, that topic is too large to cover for this assignment. After researching peer reviewed articles that discuss US traffic issues in general, you may discover that the metro system in the District of Columbia is underfunded and underutilized. Through your research, you find that you can make a claim that more funds should be made available in order to upgrade the metro system, which would improve traffic issues in the District of Columbia. This would make for a stronger and more specific argument. View the handout on sides and stakes that can help with this process.

Finding sources:

As you’ll see from the requirements of the assignment (listed in the requirements section of these instructions), you need to find peer-reviewed sources using the APUS databases. From the library welcome page, click on Advanced Search at the bottom of the page and then check the “peer reviewed” sources box filter.

This video will hopefully clarify the term, “peer-reviewed”. You may use eBooks; however, as discussed in your textbook, books generally are not as current as peer-reviewed articles. You may also use primary sources (interviews, statistics, etc); however, these primary sources should be obtained from experts within that field. If you cannot find strong sources for your chosen topic, then change your topic. If you have a question about the validity of a source, please email me, or post your question to the open forum.

Structure of the argument:

Make sure to include the following sections in your project regardless of the type of essay you choose to do:

an introduction and claim,
background,
body,
and a conclusion.

Within the body of your essay, make sure to include the following in any order:

support for your claim,
opposing or alternate views,
the strengths and weaknesses of your opponents’ claims,
and your rebuttals of their claims.

The Project:

For this assignment, you have creative options. This will not be a “traditional” essay, so part of the challenge is trying to apply the Toulmin model to a real situation in which you might use it, especially considering your topic choice and intended audience. Choose what will challenge your writing and what would be appropriate for your topic, audience, and field of study:

• Op-ed newspaper article.
• Blog post.
• Letter/proposal to stakeholders.
• Press release.
• Letter to the editor.
• Presidential address.
• Election speech (written only).
• Application for a position related to the topic.
• Defense attorney’s opening statement.
• Meeting or conference speech (written only).
• Report to supervisor or colleagues.
• Case brief.
• Advocacy statement.
• Call to action paper.

You might need to do a bit of Googling on the type of document you decide to write. For instance, if you choose to write a defense attorney’s opening statement, you’ll want to find out how that is structured by looking up examples and tips. In terms of format, since this is not a traditional essay, use the format appropriate to the option you’ve chosen; for example, a blog will look like a typical Internet blog; a case brief will look like a typical case brief, etc. Note: Regardless of the option/format, you must cite your sources both within the body of the essay and in a final reference page. The citations must be cited correctly using APA, MLA, or Chicago, whichever is appropriate to your field of study.

***In the title page, state which document type you’ve chosen so that I know how to grade it, such as stating “letter to the editor”***

Requirements:

• PURPOSE: To persuade using the Toulmin model
• AUDIENCE: The applicable audience for the type of document you’ve chosen to write.
• LENGTH: approximately 500 – 1000 words (Times New Roman font)
• SOURCES: A minimum of 3 with at least 1 from the library, and at least 1 from a professional journal or organization
• FORMAT: The citation style that is appropriate for your discipline: APA, MLA, or Chicago
• DUE: SUNDAY 11:55 pm EST

**Remember that all work submitted is to be your own original work except where properly acknowledged and cited. Do not reuse work, papers, or speeches from previous (or concurrent) classes as this violates APUS academic integrity policies. (Make sure to note the section on self-plagiarism.) **

Each week is a new topic. PLEASE SEE ATTACHED FOR GUIDANCE ON COMPLETION.

In the first week of your course, you will focus on the following area:

Explaining the role of philosophy, epistemology, and theory in research and the nature of the different types of research paradigms/methods.

In the second week, you will focus on the following two areas:

Describing research methods as part of the research design process
Explaining the scientific method of research and differentiating between different approaches

Welcome to Week 3. Your learning goals for this week are as follows:

Describing data collection and analysis methods as part of the research process
Applying appropriate secondary data to solve business problems

Week 4’s focus is on the following areas:

Describing quantitative research method as part of the research design process
Explaining the scientific method of research and differentiate between different approaches.

Week 5’s focus is on the following areas:

Synthesizing research literature by writing an annotated bibliography.

Week 6’s focus is on the following areas:

Composing well-developed academic papers to communicate knowledge and ideas about a specific research study or project.

In this discussion, give a description of your progress, what obstacles have you encountered, and what ways have you overcome these obstacles. If you are still experiencing some issue, ask here for help from your instructor and fellow students.

Continue to develop your Chapter 2 literature review around the theory for your dissertation topic.

Your initial posting is to be a detailed, well-organized response to the posed question. In addition to your initial posting with 500 words , respond to one other classmate’s thread with at least 150 words

Note – The topic has been approved

Additional work that is required to be sent by you for me to maintain going forward.

Following attached – Stages of chapter two – I have attached the document that the link has been approved. Also attached is the 10 pager document that was submitted earlier – FYI

Reviewing Literature – Can you color code the research based of the two attached word documents. The word document for topic approval and Chapter final 2. The references should be in a spreadsheet. The format is also attached.

SALESFORCE CRM4619522 NO 3.7 4/11/2028 A+ 113.817 1.468 Callable

Take the Salesforce bond above, Using that bond,

Calculate the price of the bond using the spot rates.

Discuss the calculated price and explain if it is equal to the current market price.

Please provide a workout on how calculations were done and as well as providing references used. “The textbook Petitt, B., Pinto, J., & Pirie, W. (2019). Fixed income analysis (4th ed.)” can be used as an option with this information being located in chapter 3, section 2.3/

NOTE: First, use the quoted market price to calculate the implied yield-to-maturity. Use this implied yield-to-maturity to calculate the market price out to six decimal points, and use this extended price in your calculations. Use the 30/360 convention.

Should be a minimum of 350 words