GET A PROFESSIONAL PAPER DONE BY AN EXPERT
COUN 6320Rubric: Literature Review Paper (Final Draft)Title page; Brief abstract; Paper (10-12 pages, typed, double-spaced 12-point font, APA style); systematically reviewing the literature on an educational or psychological topic of choice; Reference page. — Levels of Achievement:Exemplary 13 (7.22%) – 15 (8.33%)Proficient 10 (5.56%) – 12 (6.67%)Needs Improvement 7 (3.89%) – 9 (5%)Unsatisfactory 0 (0%) – 6 (3.33%)Research Quality: Research is thorough and thoughtful. Claims are supported by sources. Sources are integrated seamlessly and cited appropriately. Sources are reputable sources; peer-reviewed journal articles are cited. Minimum of 6 studies are reviewed in the literature review. — Levels of Achievement:Exemplary 21 (11.67%) – 25 (13.89%)Proficient 16 (8.89%) – 20 (11.11%)Needs Improvement 10 (5.56%) – 15 (8.33%)Unsatisfactory 0 (0%) – 9 (5%)APA Style: Author made a good-faith effort to use APA style in title page, in-text citations and quotations, and reference page. — Levels of Achievement:Exemplary 13 (7.22%) – 15 (8.33%)Proficient 10 (5.56%) – 12 (6.67%)Needs Improvement 7 (3.89%) – 9 (5%)Unsatisfactory 0 (0%) – 6 (3.33%)Introduction: Introduction contains background information or description of the issue/topic, definitions of key terms, and the educational significance of the topic. The author’s purpose and/or research question is stated explicitly. — Levels of Achievement:Exemplary 16 (8.89%) – 20 (11.11%)Proficient 11 (6.11%) – 15 (8.33%)Needs Improvement 6 (3.33%) – 10 (5.56%)Unsatisfactory 0 (0%) – 5 (2.78%)Method: The search strategy used to locate studies is described. The author states the databases searched and the key words used. The author also states the criteria that he/she used for including the studies in the systematic review.– Levels of Achievement:Exemplary 16 (8.89%) – 20 (11.11%)Proficient 11 (6.11%) – 15 (8.33%)Needs Improvement 7 (3.89%) – 10 (5.56%)Unsatisfactory 0 (0%) – 5 (2.78%)Results: The author provides a narrative critical review of the studies included in the review. Studies are summarized, critiqued, and synthesized. — Levels of Achievement:Exemplary 36 (20%) – 50 (27.78%)Proficient 26 (14.44%) – 35 (19.44%)Needs Improvement 11 (6.11%) – 25 (13.89%)Unsatisfactory 0 (0%) – 10 (5.56%)Discussion: Research described in the Results section is synthesized into a coherent whole. Research is evaluated and applied to teaching practice. Author discusses limitations of his/her review and gives suggestions for future research.– Levels of Achievement:Exemplary 21 (11.67%) – 30 (16.67%)Proficient 11 (6.11%) – 20 (11.11%)Needs Improvement 6 (3.33%) – 10 (5.56%)Unsatisfactory 0 (0%) – 5 (2.78%)Writing Conventions: Paper follows conventions of grammar, spelling, capitalization, punctuation, etc. Paper was proofread to be as error-free as possible. Paper is organized, clear, and coherent. Author uses the formal academic register. — Levels of Achievement:Exemplary 5 (2.78%) – 5 (2.78%)Proficient 4 (2.22%) – 4 (2.22%)Needs Improvement 3 (1.67%) – 3 (1.67%)Unsatisfactory 0 (0%) – 2 (1.11%)
0 comments