Hi The is a business Law assignment. You MUST have Business Law and the Regulation of Business (12th Ed. 2017). book to answer the questions. There 6 questions posted down here. The questions are from Chapter 10-17. Each question has its own chapter. first one is an example on how to answer them. However, when you try answer the questions, it does not have to be in that length. Just make sure that answers covers all related facts.
Example:
SAMPLE QUESTION
Able is jogging in his neighborhood and as he goes by Baker’s driveway, he sees Baker’s old red Camaro automobile with a “For Sale” sign. He inspects the car and then asks Baker the price. Baker says, “I wouldn’t sell it for less than $500.” Able replies, “I accept your offer,” and attempts to give Baker the cash. Baker refuses and declines to sell. Able sues for breach of agreement. Who wins and why?
Suggested Answer
DECISION: (Baker) Loses
RULE(s) OF LAW: (Write the generic rule(s) here; do not incorporate the facts of the above case.)
A valid contract requires an agreement (offer and acceptance) between two or more parties, which the court will enforce in the event of a breach.
In order for there to be a valid offer, the offeror must exhibit objective intent to enter into a binding contract, the material terms of the proposed contract must be definite and reasonably certain (e.g, what the offeror is willing to do and what they want the offeree to do in return), and the offer must be communicated to the offeree. It must be more than preliminary negotiations (“Can we make a deal here?”), sales talk (“This car is a great deal”), invitations for offers (“I would expect to receive at least $500”), or requests for more information (“Does this car come with a CD player?”).
APPLICATION: (Discuss the rule(s) stated above as they apply to the problem/parties, reasoning to a conclusion.)
The issue here is whether Baker’s statement constitutes a valid offer. Although he “communicated” with Able, Baker’s comment that he “wouldn’t sell it for less than $500” does not indicate that he has a present and definite intent to sell the car for $500. Rather, it appears to merely set a floor or lowest price he would consider, and to invite further discussions or negotiations with Able to finally agree upon a mutually acceptable price. It was an invitation for an offer, preliminary to an actual offer.
Therefore, since there was no valid offer, there cannot be a legal agreement that would bind Baker. So, Able loses
QUESTION 1
QUESTION 2
On January 1, 2020 Hillary mailed Bart an offer to sell Bart her car on March 1, 2020, for $10,000 cash, payable on delivery. The offer stated it was valid until February 1. Bart received Hillary’s offer on January 4, and immediately prepared a written acceptance of the offer, agreeing to all Hillary’s terms. Bart signed the acceptance and mailed it back to Hillary that same day. As of February 1, Hillary had not received Bart’s acceptance, so she sold the car to Robert that afternoon. On February 10, Hillary received Bart’s original acceptance letter, which the mailman had mistakenly delivered to her next-door neighbor a month before. On March 1, Bart showed up at Hillary’s house with $10,000 cash, and demanded delivery of the car. Hillary did not give him the car because she no longer owned it. Bart sued Hillary for breach of contract. Who wins and why?
0 comments