CILO1
( plan Mitigation an Response measures appropriate to specific problems in Saudi Arabia )
FLOODING IN JEDDAH – MITIGATION AND RESPONSE
CILO 2
Part1 ( Riyadh compound bombings 2003 you need to apply emergency mangment cycle – mitigation , preparedness,response , recovery for Riyadh compound bombings 2003 )
Part 2 (You need to compare Riyadh compound bombings 2003 to Oklahoma City bombing – what lessons did you learn ? )
CILO 3
Read PDF -CRITIQUE – what do you like about ? what do agree or disagree on.. How can you improve ?
CILO 4
Write an emergancy mangment plan for saudi arabia – Droughts hazard .
The full Project should be 3000 words
|
Criteria |
Unsatisfactory |
Baseline |
Developing |
Good |
Exemplary |
|
Problem [2.2.1] |
No hazards identified. |
One hazard identified. |
Multiple hazards identified |
…and linked to specific vulnerabilities |
…and consequent risks discussed. |
|
Measure [2.2.3] |
No initiatives identified. |
One initiative identified (either mitigation or response). |
Multiple initiatives identified (including both mitigation and response) |
…with appropriate and realistic implementation detailed |
…and contingency plans developed including discussion of why/when they are necessary. |
|
Role [2.2.3] |
No roles assigned. |
One role/ responsibility apportioned. |
Multiple roles/ responsibilities apportioned |
…with communication/ coordination plan detailed |
…and potential overlaps/ gaps discussed. |
|
Criteria |
Unsatisfactory |
Baseline |
Developing |
Good |
Exemplary |
|
Theory [1.3.1] |
No element identified. |
Identify one element of relevant theory. |
Explain multiple elements of relevant theory |
…with reference to specific sources |
…and discuss relevance to specific initiatives. |
|
Experience [2.2.2] |
No example identified. |
Identifies one relevant past example. |
Describe multiple relevant past examples |
…with details supported by reference to specific sources |
…and discuss relevance to specific initiatives. |
|
Criteria |
Unsatisfactory |
Baseline |
Developing |
Good |
Exemplary |
|
Standards [2.2.4] |
No criterion identified. |
One criterion identified. |
Identify multiple external criteria |
…explain the extent of plan’s compliance |
…and justify divergences from criteria. |
|
Scope [2.2.4] |
No aspects of coverage identified. |
One aspect of coverage identified. |
Identify multiple aspects of coverage |
…and explain how the plan addresses these aspects |
…and discuss trade-offs involved in extending coverage that limit feasibility. |
|
Risk [2.2.4] |
No risks identified. |
One risk identified. |
Identify multiple new risks created by strategy |
…and compare magnitude and probability of suite of risks before and after |
…and discuss why new risk profile represents the best available outcome in terms trade-offs in risk profiles. |
|
Criteria |
Unsatisfactory |
Baseline |
Developing |
Good |
Exemplary |
|
Cogency [4.1.2] |
No apparent organization of ideas. |
One link between ideas is clear. |
Links among ideas make message clear and easy to follow |
…and provide focused, relevant, explanation and support to the argument |
…and frame the argument within the context of a broader discourse. |
|
Template [4.1.3] |
No apparent observance of standards. |
Irregular observance of a limited range of standards. |
Regular observance of all common standards |
…with demonstrated attention to detail |
…and skillful adaptation to specific contexts. |
|
Style [4.1.1] |
No apparent observance of standard conventions of formal written style. |
Irregular observance of the most obvious and common conventions of formal written style. |
Consistent observance of most conventions of formal written style |
…with word choice appropriate to the intended audience |
…and constructions displaying variety, suitability and fluency. |
0 comments