Why , in Richard Dorment’s view , can men still not have it all “? What in particular does he mean by “it all,” and what evidence does he provide to support his position ?
Dormant published this article in Esquire, which calls itself “the magazine for men.” How can you tell that he has written his article primarily for a male audience? How might he revise the article, keeping the same basic argument, to appeal to an audience of women?
Imagine you have a chance to speak with Dorment about this article. Write out what you’d say , remembering to frame your statement as a response to what he has said . ( See Chapter 12 for advice on entering class discussions .)
0 comments