InstructionsYou have researched Muller v. Oregon and have read Supreme Court Declares School Segregation Unconstitutional in Brown v. Board of Education.Choose one of these cases and look at the impact it had on society at the time. Look through the rulings and see what the justices on each side argued.Then in a short paper, discuss how current societal mores and beliefs seemed to affect (or not affect) the SCOTUS decision and if the decisions themselves became the catalyst for societal change. How does the law affect society and society affect the way the Constitution is viewed? At the end, include a paragraph about which side of the case a forensic psychologists might support and why.CASE CHOICE, Supreme Court Declares School Segregation Unconstitutional in Brown v. Board of Education. Short Paper/Case StudyRubric(Undergraduate)Guidelines for Submission:Short papers should use double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Sources should be cited according to a discipline-appropriate citation method. Page-length requirements:1–2 pages.Critical ElementsExemplary(100%)Proficient(85%)Needs Improvement(55%)Not Evident(0%)ValueMain ElementsIncludes all of the mainelements and requirementsand cites multiple examples toillustrate each elementIncludes most of the mainelements and requirementsand citesmanyexamples toillustrate each elementIncludes some of themainelements and requirementsDoes not include any of themain elements andrequirements25InquiryandAnalysisProvidesin–depth analysisthatdemonstratescompleteunderstanding of multipleconceptsProvidesin–depth analysis thatdemonstratescompleteunderstanding of someconceptsProvidesin–depth analysis thatdemonstratescompleteunderstanding ofminimalconceptsDoes not providein–depthanalysis20IntegrationandApplicationAllof thecourse conceptsarecorrectly appliedMostof the course conceptsarecorrectly appliedSome of thecourse conceptsarecorrectly appliedDoes notcorrectly applyany ofthecourse concepts10CriticalThinkingDraws insightful conclusionsthat are thoroughly defendedwith evidence and examplesDraws informed conclusionsthat are justifiedwith evidenceDraws logical conclusions, butdoes not defend withevidenceDoes notdrawlogicalconclusions20ResearchIncorporates many scholarlyresourceseffectivelythatreflect depth and breadth ofresearchIncorporates some scholarlyresourceseffectivelythatreflect depthand breadthofresearchIncorporatesvery few scholarlyresources that reflect depthand breadthof researchDoes not incorporate scholarlyresources that reflect depthand breadthof research15Writing(Mechanics/Citations)No errors related toorganization,grammar andstyle, andcitationsMinor errors related toorganization, grammar andstyle, and citationsSome errors related toorganization, grammar andstyle, and citationsMajor errors related toorganization, grammar andstyle, and citations10Tot
0 comments