For the final paper, I’d like you to reflect on the reconciliation of Platonic, Aristotelian, and Christian thought. Specifically, how did Augustine embrace Platonic themes to elaborate his political thought? How did Aquinas embrace Aristotelian philosophy? What role do this-worldly concerns play in the thought of Augustine and Aquinas? What role does the realm of the ideal play in their thought? Contrast Augustine and Aquinas by identifying the Platonic and Aristotelian influences in their thought and how they go about reconciling these philosophical outlooks with Christianity. 
Be sure to be specific in your papers. Make sure to show an understanding of the texts we reviewed in class and make references to the texts. While this paper should be 9-12 pages long, any page length is fine so long as you delve deeply into the prompt and address it directly. Be sure to refer to the texts! 
https://online.fiu.edu/videos/?vpvid=fe01f695-5093-4910-8295-53241ad2c139
https://online.fiu.edu/videos/?vpvid=abf7c460-eeeb-4dec-8660-1c8f68f6be57
https://online.fiu.edu/videos/?vpvid=8397b556-e01f-47be-8c8d-244e54124bda
https://online.fiu.edu/videos/?vpvid=97bc369a-1529-4514-bb5e-0dd33e7b7358
https://online.fiu.edu/videos/?vpvid=8def8dbc-fd24-4bc2-8aec-b15bf3d5cf63

Continue to build on the skills of providing Web page content and structure with HTML and Web page style and layout using CSS. Design and develop an intermediate-level Web page consisting of valid HTML content that includes semantic elements, images, and tables. 

Use Visual Studio to create a New Web Site. Select the ASP.NET Empty Web Site template to create the Web site. Use the File System Web location to create the Web site at the selected location and give the Web site an appropriate name.  
Create a static Web page that includes the basic structure of a valid HTML (not XHTML) document.   

Make sure to include   

the language attribute of the html element and  
the character set attribute of the metadata element. 

Name the Web page Unit3.htm 

Link to the Unit3.css file used to style and layout the Web page.  
Assign “Unit 3 IP” to the title.  
Structure the Web page using the HTML semantic elements   

header  
section  
footer 

Within the structure of the Web page add other HTML elements including at least:   

one level-one heading for the page in the header  
navigation in the header that includes a   

one level-two heading for a table of contents in the header  
list of at least three placeholders that   

navigate to the paragraphs in the section  
implement accessibility guidelines 

one level-one heading for the section  
three paragraphs in the section   

beginning of each paragraph is a placeholder  
additional text to lengthen the document 

three paragraphs in the section   

a return placeholder that navigates back to the table of contents 

one figure element in the section to display   

Image that implements accessibility guidelines   

Copy the image file to the Web site folder.  
Submit the image file along with the document. 

figure caption 

figure element in the section to display   

figure caption  
table width   

table header  
table body   

at least three table rows  
at least three table data 

table footer that spans three columns 

Use of any inline elements should follow current standards  
No style should be applied  
Validate the HTML in the Web page. 

Develop an external CSS to provide style, presentation, and layout to the HTML document.

Select Website > Add New Item from the menu and select Style Sheet from Add New Item dialog box. Name the style sheet Unit3.css.  
Add style rules to Unit3.css to accomplish the following:   

Ensure that the semantic elements format in older browsers.  
Eliminate the default spacing around all elements.  
In the following order, use the Calibri font, Arial font, or any available sans-serif font for the text.  
Set the font size for the body to 85% of the browser’s default font size.  
Set the width of the window to display the document to 950.  
Center the text in the header.  
Set the font size for the level-one heading in the header to two and one-half times the browser’s default font size.  
Set the font size for the level-two heading in the header and the level-one heading in the section to one and three-quarter times the browser’s default font size.  
Set the text to undecorated and one and one-quarter times the browser’s default font size when the user hovers over or focuses on the links in the table of contents.  
Set the width of figures to 300.  
Display figures on the right with the paragraph text flowing to the left of the figures.  
Set the margin for figures to the equivalent of one capital M on all sides.  
Set the padding for figures to the equivalent of one capital M on all sides.  
Display a one pixel black border to the left of figures.  
Bold the text of figure captions.  
Set the size of the font of figure captions to one and one-quarter times the browser’s default font size.  
Center the text of figure captions.  
Set the padding of all paragraphs to the equivalent of one capital M on the top and bottom and zero on the left and right.  
Clear the float of the figures in the paragraphs that return the user to the table of contents.  
Center the text of the paragraphs that return the user to the table of contents.  
Display the footer in the center of the page.  
Set the padding of table data and table headers to zero on the top and bottom and to the equivalent of one-half a capital M on the left and right;  
Display a one pixel black border around all table data and table headers.  
Center the text in the table footer.  
Bold the text in the table footer. 

Validate the CSS style rules.  
Zip (compress) the Visual Studio Web site folder into a .zip file to submit. 

Grading Rubric 
  Project Criteria Exceeds: 90%–100% Very Good: 80%–89% Meets: 70%–79% Needs Improvement: Below 70%   
Content
(75%)
Response covers all topics indicated in the assignment and adds additional content.  Response covers most topics indicated in the assignment.  Response covers many of the topics indicated in the assignment. Response covers none to some of the topics indicated in the assignment.    
Effective Communication
(10%)
Demonstrates outstanding or exemplary application of written, visual, or oral skills. Demonstrates outstanding expression of topic, main idea, and purpose. Audience is addressed appropriately. Language clearly and effectively communicates ideas and content relevant to the assignment. Errors in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure are minimal. Organization is clear. Format is consistently appropriate to assignment. Presentation and delivery are confident and persuasive (where applicable). The writing was of collegiate level with no errors in spelling or grammar. Demonstrates very good written, visual, or oral skills. Demonstrates sound expression of topic, main idea, and purpose. Audience is usually addressed appropriately. Language does not interfere with the communication of ideas and content relevant to the assignment. Errors in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure are present, but do not distract from the message. Organization is apparent and mostly clear. Format is appropriate to assignment, but not entirely consistent. The writing was of collegiate level with two or less errors in spelling or grammar. Demonstrates acceptable written, visual, or oral skills. Demonstrates reasonable expression of topic, main idea, and purpose. Sometimes, audience is addressed appropriately. Language does not interfere with the communication of ideas and content relevant to the assignment. Errors in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure are present and may distract from the message. Organization is a bit unclear. Format is inconsistent. The writing was of collegiate level with several errors in spelling or grammar. Demonstrates inadequate or partially proficient application of written, visual, or oral skills. Demonstrates inadequate or partial expression of topic, main idea, and purpose. Audience is often not addressed appropriately. Language often impedes the communication of ideas and content relevant to the assignment. Errors in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure are frequent and often distract from meaning or presentation. Organization is inadequate, confusing, and distracting. The format is inadequate and obscures meaning. The writing was less than collegiate level with numerous errors in spelling or grammar.   
Supporting Analysis
(15%)
Analysis exceeds minimum requirements. Sources are used to support analysis, are appropriate, and are properly referenced. Basic analysis provided to support assertions. Sources are cited, appropriate, and properly referenced. Limited analysis provided to support assertions. Some sources are cited, appropriate, and properly referenced. No or inaccurate analysis, no sources are cited when needed, analysis and/or sources are not appropriate. When sources are used, they are not properly referenced.

Due by Thursday July 25, 2019
 
Evaluating Objective and Projective Asessments
Prior to beginning work on this assignment, review Chapters 8 and 9 in your textbook.In this assignment, you will compare projective and objective methods of personality assessment. Research a minimum of three peer-reviewed articles in the Ashford University Library that were published within the last 15 years on these techniques. In your paper, you will provide an evaluation of these techniques organized according to the outline provided below. Use information from your researched peer-reviewed articles and required sources to support your work in each section.Section 1: Objective Personality Assesment

Define the term objective in objective methods of personality assessment.
Summarize the features of objective methods of personality assessment, and provide at least three examples of these types of measures.
Explain the assumptions on which objective methods are based, and provide an analysis of empirical research testing the validity of the assumptions you identified.
Appraise the research exploring the technical adequacy (i.e., reliability and validity) of objective tests.
Describe the impact of social and culture variability on the administration and interpretation of objective tests.

Section 2: Projective Personality Assesment

Define the term projective in projective methods of personality assessment.
Summarize the features of projective methods of personality assessment, and provide at least three examples of these types of measures.
Explain the assumptions on which projective methods are based, and provide an analysis of empirical research testing the validity of the assumptions you identified.
Appraise the research exploring the technical adequacy (i.e., reliability and validity) of projective tests.
Describe the impact of social and culture variability on the administration and interpretation of projective tests.

Section 3: Synthesis, Conclusions, and Recommendations

Write a brief one-paragraph scenario for a fictitious client. Include the following information: presenting concerns (reason for referral), age, gender, ethnicity, language(s), and any other significant information (e.g., military status, health issues, marital status, sexual orientation, etc.).
Debate the arguments supporting and opposing the use of projective and objective personality assessments with your identified client.
Select a minimum of one objective and one projective measure to use with your client. Compare the use of the selected projective and objective personality measures with your identified client.
Analyze the advantages and limitations of each assessment measure you selected.
Compose recommendations to improve the validity of personality assessment.

The Evaluation of Objective and Projective Measures of Personality

Must be four to six double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. (Links to an external site.)
Must include a separate title page with the following:

Title of paper
Student’s name
Course name and number
Instructor’s name
Date submitted

Must use at least three peer-reviewed sources published within the last 15 years in addition to the course text.
Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

Carefully review the Grading Rubric (Links to an external site.) for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignmen 

 
  you’re to use a business ethics case I provided to you in the course shell or choose one on your own. You should have at least 3 different sources for reference. The textbook should be your first point of reference, of course. In addition to answering the case study analysis, the paper should include basic theory, structures, and diagrams to support your position or point of view. 
Suggested Outline for your paper:

Cover page: Term paper title,      course number, names of student and instructor, date, etc. 
Abstract. No more than 300 words
Table of content, pagination of the      document.
Topic/Issue/Problem Description:      Introduction and overview of the problem/issues.
Discussions: Fundamental analysis      with details and graphs/diagrams where applicable. 
Conclusion: Sum it all up and state      what you have learned/explain your position.
References: List of references with      standard formats and appropriate citations in the text.

Written Papers Format: 
· All papers must be word-processed; handwritten papers are NOT acceptable. 
· Assignments must be typed in double-space with no more than 12 font size. 
· Written assignments will contain a cover page showing the workshop number, title of the course, title of the paper, your name, and the date; as well as a reference page when citing material. 
· All citations must be properly referenced in accordance with accepted principals.
it should be plagiarism free. it should be ethics based analysis. You can relate the case on egoism,capatilism, deontolgy, utilitarianism which ever suits the situation talk about it. It should be based on ethics . Its a business ethics paper.
The paper should be 10 to 15 pages. Choose the scholar article case.

 REQUIREMENTS
Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. An originality report is provided when you submit your task that can be used as a guide.

At the end of each paragraph be sure to put the in-text citation. ABSOLUTELY NO PLAGIARISM! 

A.  Discuss the causes and results (i.e., cultural, political, and/or economic) of one of the following revolutions (suggested length of 2–3 paragraphs):
•  American Revolution
•  French Revolution
•  Haitian Revolution

B.  Explain the development of one of the following ideologies in relation to associated historical events (suggested length of 2–3 paragraphs):
•  nationalism
•  liberalism
•  socialism

C.  Explain three consequences (e.g., social, cultural, economic, technological) of industrialization in the 19th and 20th centuries (suggested length of 2–3 paragraphs).

D.  Discuss the causes and results (i.e., cultural, political, and/or economic) of one of the following conflicts (suggested length of 2–3 paragraphs):
•  World War I
•  World War II
•  Cold War

E.  Provide acknowledgement of source information, using in-text citations and references, for quoted, paraphrased, or summarized content.
1.  Include the following information when providing source references:
•  author
•  date
•  title
•  location of information (e.g., publisher, journal, or website URL)

 
It is important to identify and understand your own family culture in order to be able to understand and respect other cultures. Interview a family member, and an individual from another culture with which you are unfamiliar. Some examples of an individual from another culture to consider for the assignment include a neighbor, coworker, patient, or friend. Please inform the individuals of the purpose of this assignment and make sure you receive their consent.
Interviews:
Review the “Family Interview” template prior to the interview. Additional space is designated on the template for you to create three additional questions to ask both interviewees (family member and person from another culture). Additional questions should be relevant to the readings or discussion and should provide value to the interview by helping to understand culture.
Some of the questions may include:

Family beliefs: Have they changed over generations?
Educational and occupational status in the culture and in the family
Communication methods: verbal and nonverbal
Current family goals/priorities
Family member roles and organizational systems
Spiritual beliefs: current practice and death and dying
Alternative lifestyles
Work attitudes and structure

Written Paper:
Using the “Family Interview” template, interview your designated family member and the person from another culture. Be sure to write your responses in a way that will assist you in writing your paper. After the interview is completed, write a paper of 750-1,000 words that includes the following:

An introductory paragraph with the reasons for selecting the interviewees.
A summary of the responses from the interview template gathered from the interviewees.
A comparison and contrast of your findings between the two interviewees.
A reflective concluding paragraph on how family roles affect the cultural domains and relationships for each individual.

General Requirements:
Submit both the completed “Family Interview” template and the written paper” to the instructor.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.
AttachmentsHLT-324V-RS-FamilyInterviewTemplate.docx 

If statement is accepted by the professor I will contact you for the entire paper. For now all I need is to -Please submit a Word document with a well-developed introductory paragraph followed by an outline of your research paper. The thesis must be in this paragraph.

-The paper should discuss in detail an information technology of your choosing. Discuss the technology in detail; provide an analysis of the technology and industry trends. this paper should have the most recent technological developments that have occurred with the technology. also, discuss how the technology is used and adapted by different industries.

additional notes
While the thesis statement is short, it is designed, and optimally should include the claim, the hypothesis, that will be studied in the research paper assignment.
One more tip, you may be familiar with another form of writing, that being the “White Paper” which is very customary in the IT industry. The White Paper traditionally lacks a hypothesis (not always but most often), instead, it features a product or platform, whereas a research paper traditionally does not concentrate on a product or platform but rather on an overarching issue and of course is hinged on a hypothesis that can be proven or dis-proven.

The grounded theory is a qualitative approach to validating the operations needed to develop theory from observed data. This research approach places emphasis on retrieving data about peoples’ experiences in a specific setting and then logically constructing a theory from the beginning. Seeing that the study investigating GALs impact on children showed positive outcomes in studies areas with the exception of types of placement, a grounded theory will seek to take the one aspect a kind of arrangement and attempt to establish a theory regarding why placement showed no effect. However, based on the past results the theory will require starting the study from the beginning using observed data which may be collected using interviews and observation, records, or a combination of any these methods. This exploratory process explains a phenomenon and shows how the phenomenon is resolved (Hancock, Ockleford, and Windridge, 2009).
The main approach acknowledged in the application of grounded theory is the overall method of comparative analysis. The general method of comparative analysis (GMCA) comprises the comparison of evidence of cases to evaluate likenesses and differences to determine the generalizability and boundary conditions of a concept. Using the GMCA, new cases are compared to old ones, resulting in either validation of original perceptions if similar or redevelopment of perceptions if different. New cases provide clarity on existing insights and shape future inquiries with new ideas. Based on the data collected from the original study, the new qualitative study should compare additional data regarding placement in the original quantitative quasi-experimental study to the data retrieved from the new study (Johnson, 2015).
References
Hancock, B., Ockleford, E., & Windridge, K. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research. 
Retrieved from: http://www.rds-yh.nihr.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/5_Introduction-to-qualitative-research-2009.pdf
Johnson, J. S. (2015). Qualitative sales research: an exposition of grounded theory. Journal of 
Personal Selling & Sales Management, 35(3), 262-273. doi:10.1080/08853134.2014.954581

What type of drug should you prescribe based on your patient’s diagnosis? How much of the drug should the patient receive? How often should the drug be administered? When should the drug not be prescribed? Are there individual patient factors that could create complications when taking the drug? Should you be prescribing drugs to this patient? How might different state regulations affect the prescribing of this drug to this patient?
These are some of the questions you might consider when selecting a treatment plan for a patient.  

Photo Credit: Getty Images/Caiaimage
As an advanced practice nurse prescribing drugs, you are held accountable for people’s lives every day. Patients and their families will often place trust in you because of your position. With this trust comes power and responsibility, as well as an ethical and legal obligation to “do no harm.” It is important that you are aware of current professional, legal, and ethical standards for advanced practice nurses with prescriptive authority. Additionally, it is important to ensure that the treatment plans and administration/prescribing of drugs is in accordance with the regulations of the state in which you practice. Understanding how these regulations may affect the prescribing of certain drugs in different states may have a significant impact on your patient’s treatment plan. In this Assignment, you explore ethical and legal implications of scenarios and consider how to appropriately respond.
To Prepare

Review the Resources for this module and consider the legal and ethical implications of prescribing prescription drugs, disclosure, and nondisclosure.
Review the scenario assigned by your Instructor for this Assignment.
Search specific laws and standards for prescribing prescription drugs and for addressing medication errors for your state or region, and reflect on these as you review the scenario assigned by your Instructor.
Consider the ethical and legal implications of the scenario for all stakeholders involved, such as the prescriber, pharmacist, patient, and patient’s family.
Think about two strategies that you, as an advanced practice nurse, would use to guide your ethically and legally responsible decision-making in this scenario, including whether you would disclose any medication errors.

By Day 7 of Week 1
Write a 2- to 3-page paper that addresses the following:

Explain the ethical and legal implications of the scenario you selected on all stakeholders involved, such as the prescriber, pharmacist, patient, and patient’s family.
Describe strategies to address disclosure and nondisclosure as identified in the scenario you selected. Be sure to reference laws specific to your state.
Explain two strategies that you, as an advanced practice nurse, would use to guide your decision making in this scenario, including whether you would disclose your error. Be sure to justify your explanation. 
Explain the process of writing prescriptions, including strategies to minimize medication errors.

4 references not more than 5 years
zero plagiarism

Rosenthal, L. D., & Burchum, J. R. (2018). Lehne’s pharmacotherapeutics for advanced practice providers. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.

Chapter 1, “Prescriptive Authority” (pp. 1–3)
Chapter 2, “Rational Drug Selection and Prescription Writing” (pp. 5–9)
Chapter 3, “Promoting Positive Outcomes of Drug Therapy” (pp. 11–16)
Chapter 4, “Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Drug Interactions” (pp. 17–40)
Chapter 5, “Adverse Drug Reactions and Medical Errors” (pp. 41–49)
Chapter 6, “Individual Variation in Drug Response” (pp. 51–56)

 Using the information from course readings, create a “mini-proposal” which outlines a research project focused on a specific problem or question and utilizes a specific qualitative method discussed in this week’s (Week 1) readings. Emphasis should be placed on clear definition of the phenomena to be investigated, referenced procedures and methods for the investigation, and detailed description of the form and substance of expected findings from this mock study. This assignment should also address the strengths and weaknesses of applying qualitative methods as opposed to quantitative methods to answer the proposed research question.

 “In this section, you will discover an essential component to qualitative research methodology: Grounded Theory. This section also involves discussion of two other important components to qualitative research: Narrative Analysis and Ethnography.” 
Support your paper with a minimum of 5 resources. In addition to these specified resources, other appropriate scholarly resources, including older articles, may be included.

Length: 5-pages not including title and reference pages
References: Minimum of 5 scholarly resources.

Your paper should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts that are presented in the course and provide new thoughts and insights relating directly to this topic. Your paper should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards. Review APA Form and Style.

Number of Pages: 5 Pages

Academic Level: Post-graduate

Paper Format: APA