The format for the Case Reviews:
Introduction to the Case: What is the case about? why is it important?
Facts: What are the facts of the case? be specific about what happened in the case, and the procedural history of the case. What happened at the trial court? the reviewing court?
Issue: What is the issue before the Court? Again, be specific. This should be a statement that clearly identifies what issue the court is addressing in this case.
Holding: What did the Court decide? Do not put “affirmed” or “reversed” as the holding. That doesn’t tell me anything. What, specifically, did the court decide. In the case, usually the Court will use language such as “we hold that” or “we find that.” The holding is usually toward the back of the case.
Rationale: Why did the Court decide the case this way? Was there a decent? A concurring opinion? How many Justices voted with the majority? what were the reasons that different judges felt differently about parts of the case?
Case significance: How did this case change the work of law enforcement or the criminal justice system? Why is it important that we study the specifics of this case?
The second case review is of Florida v. Jardines, 11-564 from the US Supreme Court in March of 2013. Again, make sure you follow the specific format in the syllabus and make sure that you get the actual case and not a newpaper article about the case when you write your case review.
0 comments