ORDER YOUR PAPER AND GET QUALITY FOR YOUR MONEY
Introduction:In this essay, you will complete a rhetorical analysis on two arguments and then compare them to one another. Analyze, evaluate, and compare “Defunding the Police Will Actually Make Us Safer,” (Links to an external site.) by Paige Fernandez and “Defunding the Police Isn’t the Answer,” (Links to an external site.) by Jason C. Johnson and James A. Gagliano.Instructions:Your essay must contain the following sections:Introduction. Begin your assignment by creating an introduction that gives an overview of your project. Introduce and summarize the two arguments you will focus on in your essay. Include a well-developed thesis statement in your introductory paragraph.Comparative Rhetorical Analysis. Next, analyze and evaluate your two arguments. In this analysis, please include:A brief overview and summary of each argument. What are the main claims of each argument?An analysis of the rhetorical situation of each argument—audience, purpose, context (explain elements of context embedded in the arguments—the clues that suggest what the arguments are responding to, both in the sense of what has been written before it and in the sense that it is written for an audience in a particular time and place—and to evaluate how effectively the arguments persuade the audience within this specific context). How do they rhetorical situations differ in each piece? How are they the same? What effect does this have on each argument? How does this influence how each author creates their argument?An analysis and evaluation of each author’s use of ethos, pathos, and logos (Links to an external site.) as well as other rhetorical devices (Links to an external site.). Please also describe any logical fallacies (Links to an external site.) present in these arguments.Finally, create an argument where you prove which argument you analyzed is most convincing to its target audience based on your analysis of these two pieces. Writing a comparative analysis means more than simply summarizing the different arguments. Instead, you will be making an argument about the two texts, using as support specific examples from the articles you select. For instance, you may claim that one argument is more effective than another because of the reliability and quantity of its support (i.e., logos). You may also make claims about the credentials or biases of the authors and their testimony or their writing strategies, including their definitions of key terms, overall organization, and tone.Use an effective structure that carefully guides your reader from one idea to the next, thoroughly editing your writing so it is comprehensible and appropriate for an academic audience.Remember that rhetorical analyses have little to do with what each author said in their pieces. In other words, think less about summary and more about analysis. Focus more on how they attempted to be persuasive and why they chose to approach their argument in these ways.Other Requirements:Your essay must be 1250-1500 words long (not including title pages or references pages)Please use Times New Roman, 12 point font, double spacedYou must use either MLA or APA format—choose the format you are most familiar with.Grading Criteria:Does the essay thoroughly, accurately, and academically incorporate all components from the assignment instructions?Is the essay clear, coherent, and well organized?Are the introduction and thesis statement clear and easy to follow? Does the thesis statement accurately incorporate the purpose of the essay and position of the author?Is the analysis and comparison of the two arguments well developed, objective, and rhetorically based? Does it address all elements listed in the assignment instructions? Are textual and/or visual examples used to support the analysis?Is the argument created from the comparative analyses persuasive? Well-supported? Clear and cohesive? Written without bias or personal opinion on the topic?Does the essay clearly apply materials from lecture, course reading, lessons, assignments, and conferencing from Weeks 1 and 2?Is the student’s argument clear, well-supported, and persuasive? Does it avoid bias and logical fallacies? Is textual support used to support this argument?Does the essay clearly show the relationship between the analysis and the development of the argument?Is the essay revised, edited, and proofread? Is the writing clear?Does the essay follow either APA or MLA documentation and formatting guidelines? Have the two essays used for analysis been listed on the references or works cited page? Have in-text citations been used correctly and appropriately?
0 comments