1) Using each thinkers idea, examine their theories and argue whether they justify merck’s actions (giving out millions of free medication/treatment) or not.
I have already done three thinkers, So i want you to follow that outline. I explained their theory, then argued according to their theory whether they would justify Mectizans Donation Program or not. Use quotes from the reading and include the page number as well!
2) then you must consider your position. Alternatively, you may wish to present your position and preferred theoretical approach at the outset and then demonstrate how it effectively evaluates the program. In the course of your argument, you would bring in the other approaches/thinkers as sources of counter-arguments/counter-
200 words for each thinker.
The thinkers are Jensen, Greenfield and Drucker.
Drucker is a instrumental (strategic) stakeholder theory advocate –> He believes doing good for society will help the corporation do well. A strategic business solution.
Greenfield is a instrumental (strategic) stakeholder theory advocate and focuses on DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE–> he believes that executives work for all stakeholders of a firm and their job is to advance and balance the interests of ALL stakeholders, not only shareholders.
Jensen is a normative stockholder theories –> he believes that executives work for shareholders and their job is to maximize profit.
I’m attached the 3 readings, my unfinished essay (with the 3 thinkers ive already done highlighted in yellow), and some points about the three thinkers to help you write the paragraphs
0 comments