NRS 428VN Nursing Teaching Plan and Experience Paper
NRS 428VN Nursing Teaching Plan and Experience Paper
ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS
The RN to BSN program at Grand Canyon University meets the requirements for clinical competencies as defined by the Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (CCNE) and the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN), using nontraditional experiences for practicing nurses. These experiences come in the form of direct and indirect care experiences in which licensed nursing students engage in learning within the context of their hospital organization, specific care discipline, and local communities. NRS 428VN Nursing Teaching Plan and Experience Paper
Note: This is an individual assignment. In 1,000-1,500 words, describe the teaching experience and discuss your observations. The written portion of this assignment should include:
- Summary of teaching plan – (Diabetes for population ages between 13yrs old-35yrs old, pre-diabetics and diabetics)
- Epidemiological rationale for topic
- Evaluation of teaching experience – Not required
- Community response to teaching
- Areas of strengths and areas of improvement
1attachments
Slide 1 of 1
attachment_1attachment_1
Course Code NRS-428VN Class Code NRS-428VN-O503 Criteria Content Percentage 80.0% Comprehensive Summary of Teaching Plan 15.0% Epidemiological Rationale for Topic 15.0% Evaluation of Teaching Experience 20.0% Community Response to Teaching Provided 15.0% Areas of Strength and Improvement 15.0% Organization, Effectiveness, and Format 20.0% Thesis Development and Purpose 5.0% Argument Logic and Construction 5.0% Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 2.0% Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 3.0% Total Weightage 100% Assignment Title Community Teaching Plan: Teaching Experience Paper Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Summary of community teaching plan is omitted. Epidemiological rationale for the topic is omitted. Evaluation of teaching experience is omitted or incomplete. Community response to teaching is omitted. Areas of strength and improvement are omitted. Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Sources are not documented. Total Points 100.0 Less Than Satisfactory (65.00%) Summary of community teaching plan is incomplete. Overall, the teaching plan is unclear. Epidemiological rationale is unclear or incorrect. Evaluation of teaching experience is unclear or underdeveloped. The narrative is not written in a manner that evaluates the experience. Community response to teaching is partially summarized. More information is needed. Areas of strength and improvement are partially discussed. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. NRS 428VN Nursing Teaching Plan and Experience Paper
Satisfactory (75.00%) Summary of community teaching plan is offered, but some elements are vague. Some rationale or evidence is needed for clarity and support. Epidemiological rationale is summarized and provides some support for the topic. More information or evidence is needed for support. Evaluation of teaching experience is summarized. Some aspects are vague. More detail is needed to fully illustrate an assessment of the experience. A summary of the community response to teaching is presented. Some areas are unclear. More information is needed for support or clarity. Areas of strength and improvement are generally discussed. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Good (85.00%) Community teaching plan is clear with a detailed summary of each component. Minor rationale is needed for clarity or support. Epidemiological rationale is provided and provides general support for the topic. Some detail is needed for clarity. Evaluation of the teaching experience is generally presented. Some detail is needed for clarity. A description of community response to teaching is generally presented. Some information is needed for support or clarity. Areas of strength and improvement are discussed. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. NRS 428VN Nursing Teaching Plan and Experience Paper
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Excellent (100.00%) Focus of community teaching is clear, consistent with community teaching plan, detailed, and well supported. The presentation demonstrates an ability to create effective teaching plans relative to a population. Strong epidemiological rationale is provided and demonstrates support for the topic presented. A comprehensive evaluation of teaching experience is presented. Insight into self-appraisal in regard to teaching is demonstrated. A detailed description of community response to teaching is presented. Areas of strength and improvement are thoroughly discussed. The author demonstrates insight into personal strengths and areas where improvement would be beneficial. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. Comments Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. All format elements are correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. Points Earned
0 comments