ORDER YOUR PAPER AND GET QUALITY FOR YOUR MONEY
| nursing discussion question and need support to help me learn.Freud viewed dreams as the “royal road to the unconscious.”Discuss a memorable dream from your childhood. Provide as much detail about the dream as possible.Interpret the dream of two peers using the psychodynamic dream of Freud or JungSubmission Instructions:Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted, and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per response.)All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.Please post your initial response by 11:59 PM ET Thursday, and comment on the posts of two classmates by 11:59 PM ET Sunday.Late work policies, expectations regarding proper citations, acceptable means of responding to peer feedback, and other expectations are at the discretion of the instructor.You can expect feedback from the instructor within 48 to 72 hours from the Sunday due date.Grading RubricYour assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.Discussion RubricCriteriaRatingsPointsIdentification of Main Issues, Problems, and ConceptsDistinguished – 4 pointsPost substantively accurate. Identifies and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the issues, problems, and concepts surrounding the assignment. Provides exceptional and thought-provoking analysis that directly addresses details and/or examples of the main topic.Excellent – 3 pointsPost is mostly related to the topic. Demonstrates understanding of most of the issues, problems, and concepts surrounding the assignment. It provides some supporting details and/or examples. Analyses not as clear as they could be.Fair – 1-2 pointsDemonstrate limited understanding of most of the issues, problems, and concepts surrounding the assignment. No details and/or examples are given.Poor – 0 pointsPost is off-topic, incorrect and/or irrelevant to the issues, problems, and concepts surrounding the assignment. Analyses are not well organized or clear. Or nothing was posted.4 pointsAPA Formatting GuidelinesDistinguished – 2 pointsThe reference page contains at least the required current scholarly academic reference and text reference. Follows APA guidelines of components: double space, 12 pt. font, abstract, level headings, hanging indent and in-text citations.Excellent – 1.5 pointsReferences page contains one current scholarly academic resource and text reference. Follows most APA guidelines of components: double space, 12 pt. font, abstract, level headings, hanging indent, and in-text citations.Fair – 1 pointReferences page contains one current or outdated scholarly academic resource. Many errors of APA guidelines: double space, 12 pt. font, abstract, level headings, hanging indent, and in-text citations.Poor – 0 pointsReferences page contains no current scholarly academic resources, only internet webpages or no reference page. Lack of APA guidelines for references provided or in-text citations. Or nothing was posted.2 pointsWriting MechanicsDistinguished – 2 pointsRules of grammar, usage and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.Excellent – 1.5 pointsFew grammatical errors, but sentences could be clearer and more precise.Fair – 1 pointPaper contains few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors.Poor – 0 pointsPaper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.2 pointsPeer ResponsesDistinguished – 2 pointsConstructively responded to two other posts and either extended, expanded, or provided a rebuttal to each.Fair – 1 pointConstructively responded to one other post and either extended, expanded, or provided a rebuttal.Poor – 0 pointsProvided no response to a peer’s post.2 pointsTotal Points 10
0 comments