Psychology Specialists Only – Assignment 2 No Others
Assignment Details are listed below. Must have access to reading materials in assignment.
MUST HAVE ACCESS TO THE FOLLWING ARTICLES BELOW
Review the articles by Gabbard (1994) and Gonsiorek (1995). It is noteworthy that their typologies and perspectives of impaired professionals overlap conceptually, but were in fact developed independently: One group was working in Kansas, the other in Minnesota, and each began to write about their observations with this population, unbeknownst to the other. Upon learning of the other, both groups exchanged ideas, and found them to be similar descriptively, even though the Kansas group (Gabbard), based at Menninger, was staunchly psychoanalytic, while the Minneapolis group was not at all psychoanalytic and came out of a cognitive, behavioral, dustbowl empiricism mold.
You will no doubt notice another noteworthy feature of both groups is that they often avoid using current DSM diagnoses, but instead operate at a level of descriptive psychopathology and symptom clusters in their assessment typologies.
· Argue the case for why they might be doing that.
· Critique, justify, or dispute this particular non- DSM diagnostic approach while comparing it to the DSM approach.
· Assess what kinds of empirical research might test these assessment typologies.
· Briefly propose a tentative diagnosis in this arena for potential addition to the DSM and argue why this proposal should (or should not) be considered.
Gabbard, G. O. (1994). Psychotherapists who transgress sexual boundaries with patients. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 58(1), 124–135.
Gonsiorek, J. C. (1995). Assessment for rehabilitation of exploitative health care professionals and clergy. In J. C. Gonsiorek (Ed.), Breach of trust: Sexual exploitation by health care professionals and clergy (pp. 145–162). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Katsavdakis, K., Gabbard, G. O., & Athey, G. R. (2004). Profiles of impaired health professionals. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 68(1), 60–72.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.Read more
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.Read more
Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.Read more
By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.Read more