Research Proposal Summary - Academia Essay Writers

Research Proposal Summary

Research Proposal Summary

Research Proposal Summary

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS 

See attachments for further instructions.

  • attachmentCapstoneasgn1.docx
  • attachmentpsy530researchproposal.docx
  • attachmentResearchProposalWK7….docx

2

Assessing Current Approaches to Childhood Immunizations

Department of Psychology, Grand Canyon University

PSY-530: Social and Cultural Psychology

Dr. Kristi Husk

December 16, 2020

Assessing Current Approaches to Childhood Immunizations: Summary of Studies

Gesser-Edelsburg, A., Shir-Raz, Y., & Green, M. S. (2016). Why do parents who usually vaccinate their children hesitate or refuse? General good vs. individual risk. Journal of Risk Research, 19(4), 405-424.

This study analyzes vaccination aversion or refusal following the 2013 polio flare-up in Israel, given two hypothetical models. The first is Sandman’s hypothetical model, which holds that hazard discernment is involved in danger in addition to shock. The subsequent model is the influence heuristic that clarifies the danger/advantage jumbling. It expects to uncover the boundaries that restrained parental consistency with OPV vaccination for their youngsters. The study utilized blended methods, a poll review, and a substantial investigation of parents’ conversations in websites, Internet destinations, and Facebook pages. The findings demonstrate that a few parents who typically give their youngsters routine vaccinations chose not to give them OPV because of an absence of confidence in the well-being framework, worries about antibody security, and reasons explicit to the polio flare-up in Israel.

Dubé, E., Vivion, M., Sauvageau, C., Gagneur, A., Gagnon, R., & Guay, M. (2016). “Nature does things well; why should we interfere?” Vaccine hesitancy among mothers. Qualitative Health Research, 26(3), 411-425.

This subjective longitudinal study aimed to more readily comprehend why moms decide to immunize or not their infants. Fifty-six pregnant moms living in various regions of Quebec (Canada) were met. These meetings assembled data on moms’ perspectives on well-being and vaccination. Practically 50% of the moms were ordered as antibody reluctant. A subsequent meeting was led with these moms 3 to 11 months after birth to discuss their real choice and conduct concerning vaccination. The results show the heterogeneity of elements impacting immunization dynamics. Even though most antibody reluctant moms at long last decided to follow the suggested immunization plan for their youngster, they were as yet conflicted, and they kept on scrutinizing their choice. Research Proposal Summary

Hendrix, K. S., Sturm, L. A., Zimet, G. D., & Meslin, E. M. (2016). Ethics and childhood vaccination policy in the United States. American journal of public health, 106(2), 273-278.

The purpose of this study was to assess ethics and childhood vaccination. Youth inoculation includes a harmony between parents’ independence in concluding whether to vaccinate their youngsters and the advantages to general well-being from ordering antibodies. Moral worries about pediatric vaccination range within a few general well-being areas, policymakers, clinicians, and different experts. Considering progressing advancements and discussions, the creators talk about a few critical moral issues concerning youth vaccination in the United States and depict how they influence policy improvement and clinical practice. They center on moral contemplations relating to crowd immunity as a network decent, immunization correspondence, excusal of antibody denying families from training, and immunization orders. Research Proposal Summary

Sobo, E. J. (2016). What is herd immunity, and how does it relate to pediatric vaccination uptake? US parent perspectives. Social Science & Medicine, 165, 187-195.

The purpose of the study was to distinguish hard immunity and parent’s vaccination points of view. Further, knowing about crowd immunity, that general well-being specialists would consider ‘right’ did not full, prompt vaccination. Ramifications of findings for seeing how the public utilizes logical data, the likely part of general well-being informing concerning unselfishness and ‘free-riding,’ and presumptions that antibody careful parents would unshakably exploit group immunity are investigated corresponding to parent job desires and American independence.

Gilkey, M. B., Calo, W. A., Moss, J. L., Shah, P. D., Marciniak, M. W., & Brewer, N. T. (2016). Provider communication and HPV vaccination: the impact of recommendation quality. Vaccine, 34(9), 1187-1192.

The purpose of the study was to survey HPV vaccination recommendations. Getting a medical care supplier’s proposal is a definite indicator of HPV vaccination, yet little is thought observationally about which suggestion sorts are generally persuasive. We arranged parents as having gotten no, inferior quality, or excellent recommendations for HPV vaccination utilizing a file of these quality markers. Practically half (48%) of parents announced no supplier proposal for HPV vaccination, while 16% got inferior quality recommendations, and 36% got excellent recommendations. Top-notch recommendations were firmly connected with HPV vaccination conduct. However, just around 33% of parents got them.

References

Dubé, E., Vivion, M., Sauvageau, C., Gagneur, A., Gagnon, R., & Guay, M. (2016). “Nature does things well; why should we interfere?” Vaccine hesitancy among mothers. Qualitative Health Research26(3), 411-425.

Gesser-Edelsburg, A., Shir-Raz, Y., & Green, M. S. (2016). Why do parents who usually vaccinate their children hesitate or refuse? General good vs. individual risk. Journal of Risk Research19(4), 405-424.

Gilkey, M. B., Calo, W. A., Moss, J. L., Shah, P. D., Marciniak, M. W., & Brewer, N. T. (2016). Provider communication and HPV vaccination: the impact of recommendation quality. Vaccine, 34(9), 1187-1192.

Hendrix, K. S., Sturm, L. A., Zimet, G. D., & Meslin, E. M. (2016). Ethics and childhood vaccination policy in the United States. American journal of public health106(2), 273-278.

Sobo, E. J. (2016). What is herd immunity, and how does it relate to pediatric vaccination uptake? US parent perspectives. Social Science & Medicine165, 187-195.

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more
error: Content is protected !!