GET A PROFESSIONAL PAPER DONE BY AN EXPERT
The Essay will consistent of 3 points Disarmament, Secuirty, and DevelopmentThere will need to be a paragraph on the Counterarguments and weaknesses of disarmament, secuirty, and developmentI use japan as a case study for examples of disarmament after WWIIThesis: As well as preventing wars, disarmament has been a driver of economic growth and a way of reducing inequalities within and between nations. The fastest-growing economies today are among the most disarmistic. Inclusive economic policies such as those introduced by the welfare state have proved far more effective at reducing inequalities than the trickle-down economics pursued by the right. But disarmament has also been a driver of economic prosperity, not only through the increased investment in education and other forms of human capital that result from a sense of safety, but also through the knock-on effects of peace on the economy.Information: Over the past century, the world has made enormous strides towards disarmament. The first major reductions in the numbers of nuclear weapons occurred at the end of the Cold War, which brought an end to an era of proxy wars and superpower competition. The result has been an unprecedented period of peace. Since the end of the Cold War, there have not been any wars between major powers and only a handful of armed conflicts have taken place between states.The reduction of global armed forces and the reduction of global conflicts have been good for the world. The end of the Cold War was a major driver of economic growth, and the reduction in the number of military bases and the number of troops has led to economic savings and the reduction of global inequalities. The reduction of arms races and the reduction of military conflicts has also been a driver of global peace. The reduction in the number of soldiers and the reduction in the size of militaries has led to the reduction in the size of standing armies and the reduction in the size of armed forces.If you a country is not putting all of its economic might power capital resources into nuclear weapons race competition then that’s money that can be used in other places and the world is generally more safe because there are less nuclear weapons in the worldMoney can be put in development now you can have money to develop the nationBalance security of the nation with disarmamentJapan exampleAt the end of ww2 macarthur sat on a big battleship “the new jersey or missouri”They signed all the documents to make it formal the unconditional surrender of japanImmediately after that war america and russia rushed headlong in the arms race for nuclear superiorityThe time money and populous over 50 years (70) has been spent dedicated towards that arms raceJapan did not have to do that because the united states was sword to protect japanWe forbade japan to have a military and security force for internal protection“We will protect you as a nation because you do not have a standing military” and agreedJapan does not have a defense budgetJapan put all their money in development, japan significantly outpaced soaring way behind everybody in technology and technocracies they kicked the worlds ass in technologyThey are a perfect example when a country pursue a development instead of a defense programJapan is a great illustrative model on what can work and what did work, there is real concrete example of this premise disarmament (took their weapons) securities(swore to protect them) development(entire country and gross product was geared towards the development of the country)Japan still holds sway in many global markets in different economiesTransmitter the microchipThe premise is there exists assuming there is a nexus between disarmament securities and developmentLet us define our termsWhat is disarmamentA policy of leading towardsWhat is securitySecurity of a nation that the people are protectedDevelopmentThe quintiesenational ultimate goal in developing a nationDiscuss the fact that disarmamentTraditional armament of a nation requiresDisarmament would entail the antithesis of thatTherefore saving money programs time logistics that are saved by not performing all the infrastructure tasks with armamentSecurities are importantDevelopment a secure nation that feel safe within their borders free of harassmentThe money that you save the logistic programming now that is not utilized in armament can be used in development which can lead toDisarmament: we spent the entire cold war fighting building the armament the nuclear programs of the great super powers just the two of us (us soviet) and it is because of those MAD policies that we never got blown up it worksConversely because we had a strong armament program if anybody messed with us we kicked their assLibya, grenadaIf you don’t disarm you can swing the biggest stick on the blockYou get invaded and taken overSecurity if you don’t have strong security same answerConclusion:The world is safer than it has ever been. The threat of global thermonuclear war was always a theoretical possibility, but now it is a reality. The world has entered an era of global nuclear disarmament. The major nuclear powers have greatly reduced the size of their nuclear arsenals, and the number of nuclear weapons that are operational is steadily decreasing.Sources:https://history.state.gov/milestones/1945-1952/japan-reconstructionhttps://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/un/disarmament/arms/overview.html
0 comments