Was the trial court correct in rejecting the overhead portion of the liquidated damages clause as excessive? Explain. Business Law Show less

Order a customized paper at a cheap price 

Was the trial court correct in rejecting the overhead portion of the liquidated damages clause as excessive? Explain. Business Law Show lessnursing home for a three-y Show more In December 1991 NSI contracted to provide laundry service for Secrists nursing home for a three-year period. Secrist used the service until March 1993 when she unilaterally terminated the contract without NSIs consent. The written contract provided for liquidated damages in the event of an unlawful termination. The damages were 40 percent of the anticipated gross receipts under the contract for the unexpired term-30 percent for overhead and 10 percent for profits. NSI sued to collect the liquidated damages. The trial court found the liquidated damages provisions of the contract excessive because they included 30 percent recovery for overhead after fifteen months of contract period had been completed. Was the trial court correct in rejecting the overhead portion of the liquidated damages clause as excessive? Explain. Business Law Show less . TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT The post Was the trial court correct in rejecting the overhead portion of the liquidated damages clause as excessive? Explain. Business Law Show less appeared first on Term Paper Tutors.”Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you with a guaranteed plagiarism-free A+ quality paper.