**Directions and Case in Uploaded DocumentPrepare a paper that analyzes the following alternatives and the additional questions:The Three Alternatives are:1. DO NOTHING and continue the ship-breaking operations in Pakistan,2. CONTINUE THE OPERATION in Pakistan after signing an agreement with Bukhari requiring improved safety conditions, or3. SELL THE CONTRACTS for the ship-breaking operation to Chinese investors and restructure operations.1. Using the Seven (7) Ethical Decision-making Principles (Long-term Self-interest; Religious Injunction; Government Requirements; Individual Rights; Personal Virtue; Distributive Justice; and Utilitarian Benefits), evaluate which ones might be violated in each of the three alternatives, and explain how. In your analysis, identify all of the major stakeholders (i.e., company shareholders, Pakistani workers, U.S. workers, etc.) for each of the three alternatives and explain how they are affected. What is each stakeholder group’s loss or gain? See Chapter 4-Ethics and Social Responsibility in MGMT 10 (Williams)2. What are Welch’s responsibilities as the CEO and chairperson of the board of SBSRC? Is there a conflict between his responsibilities as CEO and ethics and the common good? Explain.3. Based on your analysis of the above questions, which alternative you would select if you were Welch. Explain why and how it affects various stakeholders and the tradeoffs?4. How would you monitor the operations to ensure that the impact of your decision is monitored when your recommendation is implemented to ensure that the expected results and stakeholder interests are fully considered and met?Prepare a 5-7 page paper in APA format addressing the above questions. Follow all the Guidelines for Written Assignments for this course (posted on Blackboard).The paper should include the following: A TITLE PAGE; an ABSTRACT; an INTRODUCTION (purpose of paper, Case Background, and Analysis Methods); ANALYSIS SECTIONS for the analysis including one section for each of the three alternatives; one section for Question 2 (Welch’s responsibilities as CEO); one section for Question 3 (decision); one section 4 (monitoring); one section FOR SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS; and a REFERENCE PAGE. Use centered Headings for each of the sections of the paper. The paper must follow all APA writing style formatting. See Course Guidelines for all requirements for written assignments, and have a minimum of four credible outside references used in the paper.Paper will be graded on: Completeness and accuracy of content and analysis, grammar, and formatting. Specifically, the grading rubric will be based on: How completely and accurately the facts of the case are identified and used in the analysis; how completely and accurately the ethical issues are identified; how completely and accurately the stakeholders are identified, and how they are affected by each of the three (3) options; how well the ethical decision-making model (7 Principles of Ethical Decision Making) is explained and applied to each of the decision options; how well the Decision Making Principles are weighed in terms of relative importance in each of the three (3) options; how the final decision is defended in terms of being the best given the facts and analysis of the options and the various stakeholder interests; and how complete and effective the monitoring program is to help assure that the impact of the final recommendation (decision) is as planned.
0 comments