Is transformational leadership the only effective leadership style? How do leadership styles complement one another? What leadership styles would be beneficial for the strategic leadership team?
Option #1: Establishing a Strategic Leadership Team Scenario: You have been functioning in your COO role for several months and have a relatively solid understanding of the leadership styles present in the organization. The CEO has requested that you develop a strategic leadership team to design the new 5-year strategic plan for the organization. He would like you to assess the different styles of leadership present in the organization and how these styles would complement one another as a synergistic team. The CEO would also like you to search strategic leadership models present in other industries (e.g., business) and whether there are take-aways from these models that would be appropriate for the healthcare setting. Is transformational leadership the only effective leadership style? How do leadership styles complement one another? What leadership styles would be beneficial for the strategic leadership team? Requirements: The memo should be at least 1, but no more than 2 pages, single-spaced. Use terms, evidence, and concepts from class readings. You need to cite at least 3 sources for this assignment, outside of the textbook. The CSU-Global Library (Links to an external site.) is a great place to find resources. Your paper must be formatted according to CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements. (Links to an external site.) If you need assistance with your writing style, start with the links under the Research Help and Writing Help tabs on the CSU-Global Library’s homepage (Links to an external site.). Review the Module 2 Critical Thinking Rubric for full details on how you will be graded on this assignment. Option #2: Magnet Designation and Quality Performance Scenario: You have been functioning in your COO role for several months and have a relatively solid understanding of quality performance present in the organization. The CEO has asked you to develop a presentation that briefly explains what Magnet designation is and how it relates to best practices, quality performance, and exemplar patient outcomes. The CEO would like your recommendation as to whether to pursue this costly endeavor in order to strategically link and implement an evidence-based model approach to improve patient outcomes. Requirements: The presentation should be 6-8 slides in length, excluding the title and reference slides. Each slide must provide detailed speaker’s notes that are a minimum of 100 words. The notes must draw from and cite relevant reference materials. The presentation must be submitted as a PowerPoint file (.ppt) – do not submit the presentation as a PDF file. Use terms, evidence, and concepts from class readings. You need to cite at least 3 sources for this assignment, outside of the textbook. The CSU-Global Library (Links to an external site.) is a great place to find resources. Your paper must be formatted according to CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements. (Links to an external site.) If you need assistance with your writing style, start with the links under the Research Help and Writing Help tabs on the CSU-Global Library’s homepage (Links to an external site.). Review the Module 2 Critical Thinking Rubric for full details on how you will be graded on this assignment. Rubric HCM460 Mod 2 CT HCM460 Mod 2 CT Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements 10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent 20.0 to >16.0 pts Meets Expectation Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources. 16.0 to >12.0 pts Approaches Expectation Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge. 12.0 to >8.0 pts Below Expectation Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge. 8.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials. 20.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis 15.0 to >12.0 pts Meets Expectation Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the information given. 12.0 to >9.0 pts Approaches Expectation Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation. 9.0 to >6.0 pts Below Expectation Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation. 6.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given. 15.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources 10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation Sources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. 8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation Sources or examples meet required criteria but are less‐than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. 6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation Sources or examples meet required criteria and are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. 4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Source or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style. 10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling. 8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. 6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format. 4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling. 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style 10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error. 8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors. 6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors. 4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors. 10.0 pts Total Points: 75.0
The post Is transformational leadership the only effective leadership style? How do leadership styles complement one another? What leadership styles would be beneficial for the strategic leadership team? appeared first on nursing assignment tutor.
0 comments